Sweep Frequency Response Analysis for Assessment Deformation Core at Power Transformer

  • Wilarso Wilarso
    Sekolah TInggi Teknologi Muhammadiyah Cileungsi
  • Asep Saepudin
    Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Muhammadiyah Cileungsi, Cileungsi, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Hilman Sholih
    Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Muhammadiyah Cileungsi, Cileungsi, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Asep Dharmanto
    Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Muhammadiyah Cileungsi, Cileungsi, Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jesr.v6i2.156
Keywords SFRA, FAT, SAT, Residual magnet, Induction
Abstract Views (Last 12 Months)
386 Abstract Views
253 Downloads

Abstract

SFRA (Sweep Frequency Response Analysis) is a transportation test where one of the purposes of this test is to ensure that the core of the power transformer does not shift due to the journey from the factory to the field. The SFRA testing is divided into 4 frequency range areas from 20 Hz to 20 MHz and this research is focused on the frequency range below 2 KHz, based on experience at this frequency to check transformer core problems and specific failures in shifting power transformer cores. Based on the comparison results of SFRA testing carried out at the power transformer factory during the FAT (Factory Assessment Test) with testing in the field during the first SAT (Site Assessment Test) and with the second SAT testing, there are differences in the frequency area below 2 KHz, this shows that there is a problem in the area power transformer core, before drawing a final conclusion that there is a problem or deformation in the transformer core, you must look at the results of other tests carried out in the field such as ratio test, winding resistance test, tangent delta test, excitation current test, insulation resistance (megger test). ) winding and core-frame as well as impact recorder data during the journey from the factory to the field. If all other field test results are good then the power transformer is still in good condition and ready to operate and the difference in the graph at a frequency of less than 2 KHz in the SFRA test during SAT compared to when FAT is likely to be caused by residual magnetism that is still on the core side due to testing. DC before or. Residual magnetism can occur due to static electrical phenomena due to the oil purification process or due to the induction effect of the network grounding system where the power transformer is placed

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Dharmanto and M. Shokeh, “CONSTRUCTION OF POWER TRANSFORMER TANK AGAINST HIGH,” pp. 1–11.

W. Wilarso, “Strength Analysis of Tubular Oil to Oil Cable Box Power Transformer GIS 60 MVA in the Case of Voltage Arc Energy Using the Finite Element Analysis Method,” J. Eng. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.23960/jesr.v4i2.111.

Siswoyo, “Teknik Listrik Industri,” Jilid 1., Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan, 2008.

J. R. Secue and E. Mombello, “Sweep frequency response analysis (SFRA) for the assessment of winding displacements and deformation in power transformers,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1119–1128, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2007.08.005.

S. Ab Ghani, Y. H. M. Thayoob, Y. Z. Y. Ghazali, M. S. A. Khiar, and I. S. Chairul, “Evaluation of transformer core and winding conditions from SFRA measurement results using statistical techniques for distribution transformers,” 2012 IEEE Int. Power Eng. Optim. Conf. PEOCO 2012 - Conf. Proc., no. June, pp. 448–453, 2012, doi: 10.1109/PEOCO.2012.6230906.

J. C. Gonzales and E. E. Mombello, “Automatic detection of frequency ranges of power transformer transfer functions for evaluation by mathematical indicators,” Proc. 2012 6th IEEE/PES Transm. Distrib. Lat. Am. Conf. Expo. T D-LA 2012, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TDC-LA.2012.6319080.

A. et al., “A review on fault detection and condition monitoring of power transformer,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 100–110, 2019, doi: 10.21833/ijaas.2019.08.014.

S. N. H. Md Mominul Islam, Gareth Lee, “A review of condition monitoring techniques and diagnostic tests for lifetime estimation of power transformers,” Electr. Eng., vol. 100, pp. 581–605, 2018, doi: doi: 10.1007/s00202-017-0532-4.

A. Saepudin, A. Dharmanto, and W. Wilarso, “The Pressure Relief Venting for Air Insulation Cable Box at Power Transformer,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022. doi: 10.1063/5.0116405.

A. Kraetge, M. Krüger, J. L. Valásquez, H. Viljoen, and A. Dierks, “Aspects of the Practical Application of Sweep Frequency Response Analysis (SFRA) on Power Transformers,” CIGRÉ 2009 6th South. Africa Reg. Conf., pp. 1–10, 2009, [Online]. Available: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Aspects+of+the+Practical+Application+of+Sweep+Frequency+Response+Analysis+(+SFRA+)+on+Power+Transformers#0

A. Saepudin, “Optimalisasi Material Utama Pada Auto Transformator 100 MVA,” TEKNOSAINS J. Sains, Teknol. dan Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.37373/tekno.v7i1.2.

IEEE Power and Energy Society, IEEE Std C57.149-2012, Guide for the Application and Interpretation of Frequency Response Analysis for Oil-Immersed Transformers, no. March. 2013.

60903 IEC, International Standard International Standard, vol. 2003. 2003.

M. A. Habibi et al., “The study of sweep frequency response analysis for inspecting the performance of transformer,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1595, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1595/1/012016.

W. H. Tang, A. Shintemirov, and Q. H. Wu, “Detection of minor winding deformation fault in high frequency range for power transformer,” IEEE PES Gen. Meet. PES 2010, no. July 2010, 2010, doi: 10.1109/PES.2010.5589573.

M. A. Habibi et al., “The study of sweep frequency response analysis for inspecting the performance of transformer,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1595, no. 1, pp. 0–9, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1595/1/012016.

Cover
Issue
Published
2025-02-21
How to Cite
[1]
W. Wilarso, A. Saepudin, H. Sholih, and A. Dharmanto, “Sweep Frequency Response Analysis for Assessment Deformation Core at Power Transformer”, JESR, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 110–115, Feb. 2025.